Is there a difference? by PaulT



PaulT
Now is what Banksy does OK or is it graffiti - i.e. painting on buildings etc in the same way that others do who are then prosecuted?
Paul

That apart Mrs Lincoln, did you enjoy the play

Image

Posted 28 Jun 2014, 18:18 #1 


Jumper
Whichever way you look at it, it's graffiti. It is after all, unrequested defacing of someone else's property. The fact that it commands a huge price on the 'Art' market is probably what makes it 'OK'. If he would like to mysteriously do a daub on my house he's more than welcome. The work has a certain appeal to it, much in the way of cartoonists and can be a critical comment on current affairs but I wonder if it is widely known how it is done?

As I understand it stencils are pre-prepared and used one after another to spray paint rapidly, unlike the Rolf Harris method (if that term dodges the filter on this august board).

Posted 28 Jun 2014, 19:14 #2 

User avatar
Dave
I would have thought, as suggested:

  • Unrequested = graffiti = not acceptable
  • Requested/commissioned = (probably) art = acceptable

Whether or not you like it I suppose it down to personal taste!

Posted 29 Jun 2014, 15:15 #3 


Top