More "reality" TV on the way? by raistlin

  • Related topics: (no related topics)

User avatar
raistlin
Paul

Cogito ergo sum... maybe?

Click the image to go to Nano-Meet Website
Image

Posted 10 Apr 2012, 21:57 #1 

User avatar
Tourerfogey
Are we allowed to phone in and vote?

Posted 10 Apr 2012, 22:05 #2 

User avatar
raistlin
Oddly enough, now that I give it consideration, Davina McCall dressed as a judge is an intriguing thought ;)
Paul

Cogito ergo sum... maybe?

Click the image to go to Nano-Meet Website
Image

Posted 10 Apr 2012, 22:19 #3 


PaulT
When they eventually show whole trials, having done Jury Service my experience is that the language can get quite colourful especially when a witness is asked 'what did he say then'.

Will it be bleeped out?
Paul

That apart Mrs Lincoln, did you enjoy the play

Image

Posted 11 Apr 2012, 07:33 #4 

User avatar
geesmith
When I was on jury service, the guy who claimed to have been wronged by the yob was doing okay up to the part where he started re-enacting the struggle like an 8 year old. I suspect that's why we, possibly incorrectly, found the yob not guilty.

It was sort of "I'd give him a thick ear as well" in the debate we had.

There's always someone on a jury that thinks the accused must be guilty by default in my experience. Twice I was called for service and every jury had at least one. One woman thought the innocent party should also be guilty of dangerous driving if the other guy was. Oh fear. :shock:

Posted 11 Apr 2012, 18:11 #5 


Top

cron